<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.0</generator>
	<title>Migration Law and Practice</title>
	<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						<title>The bar is lifted for business visas</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=400</link>
						<category>Business Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 08:23:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>Here are the basic changes to come into effect on 19 April 2010:

·         The definition of main business for non-publicly listed companies now requires the applicant to have a 30% interest in the business if its turnover is more than $400,000  or 51% interest if the turnover is less than $400,000 [previously it was just 10%];

·         For the subclasses 160 Business Owner (Provisional) &amp;amp; 161 Senior Executive (Provisional) visa the applicant must have net assets of $800,000 [instead of $500,000]

·         Subclass 163 - State/Territory Sponsored Business Owner (Provisional) the pathway via being a senior manager is gone and the applicant needs to have $500,000 to conduct or establish the business instead of $250,000.

·         Similarly for the Subclass 164 - State/Territory Sponsored Senior Executive (Provisional) visa the applicant needs to have $500,000 to conduct or establish the business instead of $250,000
</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>MERIT REVIEW TRIBUNALS CAN ASK FOR INFORMATION ORALLY</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=399</link>
						<category>Merit Review</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:42:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>MRT &amp;amp; RRT are given power to ask for information orally</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>SOME STATISTICS ON EMPLOYER NON-COMPLIANCE</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=398</link>
						<category>Subclass 457 Visa</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 19:44:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>A window into the level of monitoring by DIAC of employer behaviour in relation to 457 visas was gained through a question in Federal Parliament on 11 Feb 09</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>JUDICIAL REVIEW TIME LIMITS CAN BE EXTENDED</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=397</link>
						<category>Judicial Review</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 19:41:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>In a big reform the Federal Courts will have power to extend time to bring a judicial review application against all migration law decisions.</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>COURT FINDS MRT WRONG ON CONTRIVED MARRIAGE</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=396</link>
						<category>Family Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:28:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>In a decision which goes through the MRT evidence in painstaking way, the Federal Court has found that the Migration Review Tribunal was ‘unreasonable’ in concluding that a marriage was contrived.
The case shows that through a careful analysis of the evidence a tribunal’s reasoning can be flawed in drawing conclusions about contrivance in migration matters.
Kayikci v MIAC [2009] FCA 92 (13.2.09) concerned a second marriage where even though there were strong factors indicating a genuine relationship the MRT found the relationship was contrived. 
</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>OFFSPRING BROUGHT TO AUSTRALIA BY ONE PARENT</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=395</link>
						<category>Family Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:23:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>Marriages involving people from different countries and the subsequent birth of offspring often leads to irreconcilable disputes between the husband wife in the event of divorce about where the children should live.
The family in LK v Dir-General, Dept of Community Services [2009] HCA 9 (11.3.09) was one such example.
</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>FURTHER SKILLED VISA CHANGES - SA</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=394</link>
						<category>Skilled Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:43:00 +1100</pubDate>
						<description>South Australia eases back on skilled visas</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>FURTHER SKILLED VISA CHANGES - SA</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=393</link>
						<category>Skilled Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:43:00 +1100</pubDate>
						<description>South Australia eases back on skilled visas</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>English Language prerequisites for students visas</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=392</link>
						<category>Student Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:49:00 +1100</pubDate>
						<description>English language requirements for student visas can be met up to time of decision according to 2 MRT decisions, even though DIAC requires applicants to meet the requirements prior to application. 

</description>
					</item>
				
					<item>
						<title>TRA PATHWAY D (the experience pathway DEFERRED INDEFINITELY</title>
						<link>http://www.conferences21.com/mlp/index.php?news=391</link>
						<category>Skilled Visas</category>
						<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:57:00 +1000</pubDate>
						<description>The Trades Recognition Authority has decided that the review of Pathway D will be delayed indefinitely,  For all practical purposes, this reduces the options for overseas skilled visa applicants.  They can access VETASSESS if their trade can be assessed via one of the recognised countries otherwise they have to find a Registered Training Organisation to undertake an on-the-job skill assessment either in Australia (via temporary visit) or  if the RTO has a program of going overseas to do such assessments.</description>
					</item>
				
			
		
<description>Migration Law and Practice</description>
</channel>
</rss>